- Loading stock data...
Was Wyoming prepared for the overturn of Roe?
The answer to the headline question appears to be no, but readers can decide based on responses from Gov. Mark Gordon’s office.
As Wyoming News has reported, the state is still awaiting the implementation of House Bill 92, signed by Gordon on March 15, the trigger law that prohibits most abortions (baby murder) in the case that the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Roe v. Wade were overturned, which unequivocally happened on June 24 in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization majority opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito.
While Wyomingites await the slaughter of innocent unborn children finally being criminalized in the state, several other states have already enacted laws to protect the unborn. The status of state laws is effectively the same as last week when Wyoming News last reported on the issue.
Life Site News reported this week: “As of Tuesday, laws in around 10 states have now taken effect criminalizing abortion throughout pregnancy with virtually no exemptions. A handful of other states have sharply restricted the murder of unborn children within their borders, and several more could enforce bans in the coming days and weeks following the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling.”
As for H.B. 92, the law included a review process by the attorney general’s office as well as a 5-day wait after Gordon certifies the results of that review making July 29th the date when the law goes into effect if the full review takes place. That review provided the attorney general’s office a period of “within 30 days,” which is clearly not a required 30 days.
Why was that review process put in place? Likely in the case there was a question if Roe was indeed overturned, but Alito made no room for subjectivity in his Dobbs opinion which not only overturned Roe but also the 1992 opinion under Casey v. Planned Parenthood.
“Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives,” Alito’s opinion concluded.
Seems like the only review necessary was a quick reading of that conclusion, doesn’t it?
However, when asked for a timeline for the review, Gordon’s office implied to Wyoming News that the full process would be used.
Wyoming News followed up this week to point out that the 30 days of review was not required as well as hoping to finally get answers to several questions related to enforcement of H.B. 92, which remain unanswered.
“The Wyoming Attorney General is currently analyzing the decision and the Governor is awaiting her analysis before proceeding with certification. The Governor doesn’t have additional comment on the bill, its provisions or the timing of the AG’s review,” Michael Pearlman, communication’s director, responded.
Pearlman also pointed Wyoming News to Gordon’s statement after the June 24 Dobbs opinion was released.
“This is a decisive win for those who have fought for the rights of the unborn for the past 50 years,” Gordon said. “I signed Wyoming’s prohibition on abortion bill because I believe that the decision to regulate abortions should be left to the states.”
A nice sentiment that answers nothing and is tantamount to just political pandering to his base.
Why does it matter that H.B. 92 be expedited, when clearly there is no need for a full 30 days of review? Because the planned first surgical abortion facility in the state, Wellspring Health Access in Casper, still plans to open and offer abortions, which is still one of the “services” listed on its website.
That is one of the questions awaiting an answer, whether or not that murder facility was provided state licensing to surgically murder babies, and if so, has that licensing been revoked with H.B. 92 set to take effect.
Gordon’s office was asked if state or local police would enforce H.B. 92, if abortifacients (medical abortions) are included in the abortion prohibitions and if he supports removing the exemptions for rape and incest included in H.B. 92 as there is support from state legislators to remove those exemptions.
Wyoming News was told that those questions would be included in the attorney general’s review of the Dobbs opinion, but why? Aren’t such enforcement questions ones that should have been discussed and determined after H.B. 92 was signed in March, and isn’t the current review simply to determine if Roe was indeed overturned?
And take note of the abortifacients question. Nearly 200 babies have been murdered over the last two years in Wyoming through use of abortion pills. If abortifacients are not covered under H.B. 92, what does the overturning of Roe really change in Wyoming? Sure, the surgical abortion facility should be stopped from operating surgical abortions, but babies will still be slaughtered with use of drugs rather than surgery.
As residents await the implementation of H.B. 92, hopefully they will finally have answers to how the law will be enforced. Wyoming News will follow up when answers are ready.
President Donald J Trump’s First Wife, Ivana Trump, Dead At Age 73
Photo courtesy of Wikipedia
According to Wikipedia, Ivana Marie Trump (née Zelníčková, Czech: [ˈzɛlɲiːtʃkovaː]; born February 20, 1949) is a Czech-American businesswoman, media personality, fashion designer, author, and former model. She lived in Canada in the 1970s before migrating to the United States, where she married Donald Trump in 1977. She held key managerial positions in The Trump Organization as vice president of interior design, CEO and president of Trump’s Castle casino resort, and manager of the Plaza Hotel.
Court Grants Air Force Service Members Relief from Shot Mandate
| CINCINNATI, OH — A federal district court in Ohio has granted a temporary restraining order for the entire class of the U.S Air Force against the unlawful Department of Defense COVID shot mandate. Thousands of these service members who oppose receiving the shot due to their sincerely held religious beliefs have been denied their religious exemptions. In his order for Hunter Doster, et al. v. Hon Frank Kendall, et al., Judge Matthew McFarland stated that, “All active-duty and active reserve members of the United States Air Force and Space Force, including but not limited to Air Force Academy Cadets, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Cadets, Members of the Air Force Reserve Command, and any Airman who has sworn or affirmed the United States Uniformed Services Oath of Office and is currently under command and could be deployed, who: (i) submitted a religious accommodation request to the Air Force from the Air Force’s COVID-19 vaccination requirement, where the request was submitted or was pending, from September 1, 2021 to the present; (ii) were confirmed as having had a sincerely held religious belief by or through Air Force Chaplains; and (iii) either had their requested accommodation denied or have not had action on that request.” Judge McFarland also wrote, “The proposed class satisfies the (b)(2) requirement. Defendants’ attempt to characterize the relief sought as hinging on individualized determinations concerning their religious accommodation requests and sincerely held religious beliefs. But the relief the proposed class seeks is the same: a religious accommodation relating to the COVID-19 vaccine mandate. And they have been harmed in ‘essentially the same way.’” |
 |
| “They face separation from the Air Force and other disciplinary measures. A single injunction would provide relief to the entire class. Indeed, the main purpose of a (b)(2) class is to provide relief through a single injunction or declaratory judgment. Because Defendants have uniformly maintained a policy of overriding Airmen’s religious objections to the COVID-19 vaccine, they have acted ‘on grounds that apply generally to the class.’ Moreover, the class definition requires that a Chaplain certify that the airman’s religious beliefs are sincerely held. Finally, a single injunction would provide the proposed class with the relief they seek from the harm they stand to suffer,” the court wrote. The Department of Defense has until July 21 to file a brief arguing why the temporary restraining order should not be extended into a preliminary injunction. Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver said, “This is a great decision that grants protection for the religious freedom for all Air Force personnel from Joe Biden’s unlawful COVID shot mandate. No service member should be required to choose between service to the country and service to God. Liberty Counsel will be pursuing class-wide protection for the remaining branches of the military.” Liberty Counsel is a public law firm and a news partner with Wyoming News. |
Park County Attorney Brian Skoric is Charging 47-Year-Old Joseph Underwood, Who Both Cheyenne Judge And the State Of Wyoming Claim Is “Mentally Ill and Extremely Incompetent”
Leda M. Pojman (R) is running against Brian A. Skoric for Park County Attorney
One wonders why Park County Attorney Brian Skoric is attempting to charge 47-year-old Joseph Underwood when a Cheyenne Judge and the State have already ruled the man is mentally ill and highly incompetent.
The Wyoming News wants to remind the public that Park County Attorney Brian Skoric is running for re-election. Skoric claims that disposal and concealment of a human body is a felony and therefore issued a warrant for the arrest of Underwood. Underwood is currently in the custody of the Laramie County Sherriff’s Detention Center. Skoric, at some point, will have Underwood transported to the control of Park County to face charges. Underwood has been a resident at the Wyoming State Hospital in Evanston, Wyoming, and has been deemed mentally ill by the State. Yet Skoric wants to throttle the mentally sick and highly incompetent Under for further charges such as Possession of a firearm when Underwood was a felon, Fleeing and eluding officers, and interference with police.
Brian Skoric, multiple years ago, charged Underwood with the exact charges back in 2019 but now wants to refile charges. Many in public are concerned that Brian Skoric has mental issues. Why on earth would he file charges on a mentally ill person deemed by another court and the state of Wyoming as mentally sick and highly incompetent? Is it because he is running for re-election?
Skoric is willing to waste Park County taxpayer money by putting the public and a mentally ill Underwood through a court case when the Wyoming State Hospital has concluded that Underwood is NOT COMPETENT and is UNFIT to stand trial and will not be competent in any “foreseeable future.”
Several Defense attorneys were contacted by the Wyoming News and questioned about the Underwood case and Park County Attorney Bian Skoric’s actions. Every one of the Defense attorneys indicated to the Wyoming News reporters that if they were assigned to the Underwood case, they would use the “unfit” “incompetent to stand trial” evidence that has already been deemed by a Wyoming Court as bonafide. The Forensic evaluation of Underwood would “ultimately fold Skoric’s charges.” indicated the defense lawyers.
The Defense lawyers also stated that they had not been assigned to the case of Underwood, so they are only quarterbacking from the sidelines. Underwood was initially charged in Laramie County for sexual assault in the first degree and two counts of strangulation.
According to the District Court Judged Peter Froelicher, Underwood is “unfit” to stand any trial. Judge Peter Froelicher has twice ruled that Underwood was “unfit” twice, one year apart from the last ruling.
Nothing has changed according to the Wyoming State Hospital in Evanston Wyoming.
No one denies that it is highly probable that Underwood is allegedly responsible for the murder of Elizondo. But Underwood can never be charged again for Elizondo’s murder. However, in Park County, County Attorney Brian Skoric is determined to waste taxpayer money on charging Underwood regardless of Underwood’s already substantiated Mental illness.
The Park County taxpayers are confused as to why Brian Skoric wants to waste valuable, hard-earned taxpayer money on Underwood when the same outcome will occur, just like in Cheyenne, Wyoming. SO… who is getting screwed here? it is the Park County taxpayers.
The overzealous Park County Attorney named Brian A. Skoric is running for re-election. It appears that Brian Skoric is willing to use Underwood as his political pawn for his own political gain.
University Attended:
University of Wyoming, B.A., 1989
Law School Attended:
University of Wyoming, J.D., 1992
Year of First Admission:
1995
Admission:
1995, Wyoming
ISLN:
909657701
FOIA requests shows U.S. Military Industrial Complex engaged in 23 secret wars in last five-plus years
The conflict in Ukraine is the most visible U.S.-backed proxy war going on.
It started in 2014 under the Obama regime as the Department of Defense (DoD) engaged in regime change, and the Biden regime has helped double down on the Military Industrial Complexes profiteering.
Well, did you know that America was involved in 23 secret proxy wars in the last five-plus years? That’s what The Intercept learned as the result of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.
As has been obvious for some time for those willing to be honest, the Military Industrial Complex has complete support from the Democrats and Republicans. The 23 secret wars were between 2017 and 2020 under the Trump regime.
Tim Brown, for Sons of Liberty Media, wrote: “This is just another example of why the federal government has become a tyrannical beast and the states should seriously consider abolishing it at the most and seceding from it at the least. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents have revealed that the US has been unlawfully spending money to engage in nearly two dozen secret wars, and you can bet it was on behalf of corporations. As a note to remember: These ‘wars’ took place under President Donald Trump.”
The Intercept reported that these wars have been conducted under the secretive 127e program in which U.S. Special Operations forces engage in the low-profile wars.
The program has been reported on before, but the documents obtained under FOIA are the first public acknowledgement of the existence of the program. These secret wars were conducted in the Middle East and Asia-Pacific region. Some of the countries include Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Tunisia and Yemen among others.
The Intercept reported:
“The documents and interviews provide the most detailed picture yet of an obscure funding authority that allows American commandos to conduct counterterrorism operations ‘by, with, and through’ foreign and irregular partner forces around the world. Basic information about these missions — where they are conducted, their frequency and targets, and the foreign forces the U.S. relies on to carry them out — are unknown even to most members of relevant congressional committees and key State Department personnel.”
“Through 127e, the U.S. arms, trains, and provides intelligence to foreign forces. But unlike traditional foreign assistance programs, which are primarily intended to build local capacity, 127e partners are then dispatched on U.S.-directed missions, targeting U.S. enemies to achieve U.S. aims. ‘The foreign participants in a 127-echo program are filling gaps that we don’t have enough Americans to fill,’ a former senior defense official involved with the program told The Intercept. ‘If someone were to call a 127-echo program a proxy operation, it would be hard to argue with them.’”
These proxy wars have cost the American taxpayers $310 million, and there’s practically no oversight as the U.S. Congress is provided effectively no information regarding these secret wars. The Congress, for its part, doesn’t want to know as they are the ones who gave this power to the DoD in the wake of 9/11 as so-called “counterterrorism operations.”
An anonymous government official familiar with the 127e program told The Intercept: “It was designed to prevent oversight.”
Meanwhile, neocon criminal John Bolton has admitted to his part in criminal regime change activities overseas.
On MSNBC this week, Bolton said: “As someone who has helped plan coups d’état — not here but, you know, other places — it takes a lot of work.”
Brown, responding to Bolton’s admission, wrote for Sons of Liberty: “John Bolton is not American in his thinking. He is a neocon, a warhawk, a reckless man that endangers not only those who live in the United States but those who live in foreign countries and his recent admission on live television that he was involved in the planning of coup d’états of foreign governments is an admission of huge crimes against other countries.”
At some point, the empire will fall and it feels nearer than ever before. This hubris cannot continue. Just a reminder, the U.S. national debt now stands at $30.6 trillion, according to usdebtclock.org.
“The problem is that America has, for the past few decades, attuned itself to believe it must be the sole unipolar power in the world, and that its hegemony affirmed after the Cold War amounts to a form of destiny and fate. This has produced a foreign policy premised on extreme levels of aggression, zero-sum thinking, and a rendition that any competitors in any region of the globe must be subject to the full weight of military and economic containment. They cannot be dealt with pragmatically or creatively, or allowed to join a partnership with the US in what might be in the world’s best interests. Unless the world is permanently and irreversibly molded to America’s image, there never can be peace.”—Tom Fowdy, RT
Vaxxed Children Up to 30,200% Likelier to Die, UK data shows
Data from the United Kingdom’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that children injected with the experimental gene therapy jabs, called COVID “vaccines” by the mainstream, are at a far more likely risk of dying of all causes than children who have not been jabbed.
The data (found here) was published by the UK government in May, before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) gave its rubber stamp for emergency use authorization (EUA) for the mRNA jabs of Pfizer and Moderna to be injected in children as young as 6 months old.
The Exposé ran calculations on the ONS data, which spans over a years’ worth of data between Jan. 1 of 2021 to March 31 of 2022. As reported by The Exposé:
“These figures are horrifying. The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, double vaccinated children aged 10-14 were statistically up to 39 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children, and double vaccinated teenagers aged 15-19 were statistically up to 4 times more likely to die than unvaccinated teenagers.”
“But it’s the triple vaccinated figures that are truly frightening when it comes to children.”
“The ONS data shows that between 1st Jan 21 and 31st March 22, triple jabbed children aged 10-14 were statistically 303 times more likely to die than unvaccinated children of Covid-19, 69x more likely to die of any cause other than Covid-19 than unvaccinated children, and 82x more likely to die of all-causes than unvaccinated children.”
“This suggests that three doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for children by an average of 8,100%, and the risk of dying of Covid-19 by an average of 30,200%. Whilst two doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 3,600%.”
“But as things currently stand it’s the other way round for teenagers. Two doses of a Covid-19 injection increase the risk of all-cause death for teens aged 15 to 19 by an average of 300%. Whilst three doses increase the risk of all-cause death by an average of 100%.”
The FDA approved the EUA status of the shots for those 6 months to 5 years old last month.
“Those trusted with the care of children can have confidence in the safety and effectiveness of these COVID-19 vaccines and can be assured that the agency was thorough in its evaluation of the data,” Robert Califf, an FDA commissioner, said.
If you’re an adult who submitted to the shots believing that line starting in December of 2020 when the mass jab campaign began, that’s your choice. If you’re parent and believe it with the EUA allowing your kids to be injected, it’s child abuse to allow your kids to be experimented on.
First off, there is absolutely no need for kids to take the shots which is even recognized by mainstream media outlets recognize, like Allysia Finley with the Wall Street Journal.
“In fact, we don’t know if the vaccines are safe and effective,” Finley wrote. “The rushed FDA action was based on extremely weak evidence. It’s one thing to show regulatory flexibility during an emergency. But for children, Covid isn’t an emergency. The FDA bent its standards to an unusual degree and brushed aside troubling evidence that warrants more investigation.”
More importantly, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) maintained by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) shows how unsafe the jabs are for all Americans, children to adults.
The most recent VAERS data, released on Friday, showed 29,273 deaths by the jab. Wyoming News has previously reported that the CDC admits that VAERS undercounts adverse events by a factor of 6X while independent reviews show a factor of 41X. That puts the likely death count from the jabs between 175,638 and 1,200,193.
As for children, VAERS is now seeing reports of hallucinations and children having suicidal thoughts. This is in children 8 years old and younger.
Steve Kirsch, executive director for the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, is hearing of an increase in seizures among toddlers from nurses since the recent EUA was approved.
“Doctors are mystified by a rash of seizures, rashes, etc. happening to 2 and 3-year-old kids,” Kirsch wrote. “The only thing these kids have in common is that they were given the COVID vaccine just days earlier (two to five days earlier).”
Kirsch added: “The doctors cannot figure out what is causing the seizures (since it couldn’t be the vaccine since those are safe and effective). The medical staff is not permitted to talk about the cases to the press or on social media or they will be fired. One nurse posted something to the effect of ‘how is this legal????’ I had to paraphrase to protect the poster. This is why you are hearing these reports from me. They can’t fire me.”
Meanwhile, VAERS is reporting adverse events among 2-month-olds having cardiac arrests. Global Research detailed one such report asking the important question:
“How did a 2-month-old baby receive the mRNA vaccine? These vaccines have not yet received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for approved use in children ages five and under by the FDA, or any other regulatory authority, and even if it will, the EUA will only include babies 6 months and older.”
“Was this baby a participant in Pfizer-BioNTech’s clinical trials, testing efficacy and safety among babies?”
“The answer is unclear. According to the person who wrote the report ‘Unsure if patient was enrolled in clinical trial.’ However, the author of the report also states that the report was ‘received from a contactable Other Health Care Professional by Pfizer from the Regulatory Agency.’”
Did the FDA know about this adverse event, which was reported in February of 2021, before giving its EUA stamp of approval? If they did, do they even care?
